How much of the new site should the pitch demo show?

Only the pages that carry the argument. A full walkthrough at pitch stage invites scope discussion you have not priced yet, and dilutes the one comparison you want the client to make.

Does it save time later?

Yes -- a client who approved a static mockup approved an interpretation, and that surfaces in week three as "this is not what I thought it would do". A clickable approval is far narrower to disagree with, which shows up in fewer revision rounds.

← Back to blog

Pitching a Redesign With a Demo Instead of Mockups

August 23, 2026

A redesign pitch usually arrives as flat screens in a deck. The client is then asked to approve something they have to assemble in their head — how it moves, what happens on click, what the second page looks like.

Most redesign objections come from that gap rather than from the design. A clickable version closes it before the meeting.

Demo their current site first

The strongest opening in a redesign pitch is not your proposal — it is a short demo of their existing site with the problems captioned. Three steps: where a visitor loses the thread, what the form asks for, how many clicks to the thing they sell.

It shifts the meeting from "do we like this design" to "yes, that is the problem", which is the only frame in which a redesign gets approved.

Then the proposed flow, clickable

The same journey, done the new way, so the comparison is direct.
Their real content, not lorem — a client cannot judge a layout stuffed with placeholder text and will comment on the text instead.
Only the pages that carry the argument. A full site walkthrough at pitch stage invites scope discussion you have not priced.
No animation flourishes. They distract from the decision you need in this meeting.

What it prevents later

A client who approved a static mockup has approved an interpretation, and their interpretation surfaces in week three as "this is not what I thought it would do". That is a scope conversation you pay for.

A clickable approval is a much narrower thing to disagree with afterwards, and the difference shows up in revision rounds rather than in the pitch.

The practical cost

A redesign pitch demo is twenty minutes of recording against a staging build or a prototype. That is well inside what agencies already spend assembling a deck, and it replaces slides rather than adding to them.

It also becomes the first asset of the project if you win: the same demo, extended, is your sign-off artefact and later your handover material.

Frequently asked questions

Should a redesign pitch use a clickable demo instead of mockups?: Alongside them. Flat screens ask the client to assemble the experience in their head, and most redesign objections come from that gap rather than from the design. Opening with a demo of their CURRENT site, problems captioned, is the strongest version.
How much of the new site should the pitch demo show?: Only the pages that carry the argument. A full walkthrough at pitch stage invites scope discussion you have not priced yet, and dilutes the one comparison you want the client to make.
Does it save time later?: Yes -- a client who approved a static mockup approved an interpretation, and that surfaces in week three as "this is not what I thought it would do". A clickable approval is far narrower to disagree with, which shows up in fewer revision rounds.

Keep reading

This is what Demorta does

Click through it — the same kind of demo you can record of your own product.

Try it on your own product

Record your first interactive demo free.

Five demos on the free plan, forever. No credit card, no trial countdown, no sales call. Install the Chrome extension, click through your product once, and you have a shareable link in about ten minutes.

Start free →