← Back to blog

When Your Marketing Shows a Product You No Longer Have

August 28, 2026

Every company that ships regularly has marketing showing a version of the product that no longer exists. It is not neglect, it is arithmetic: the product changes faster than the assets describing it.

The damage is quiet. A prospect who signs up and finds a different interface has been mildly misled before they started.

Why it always happens

  • Assets are made once, at launch, when there is time and attention.
  • Nobody owns them afterwards, so drift has no detector.
  • Retaking is tedious -- eleven screenshots for one article, resubmitted for review in some channels.
  • Nobody visits their own marketing, so the person who would notice never looks.

Make updating cheap rather than scheduled

Review cycles fail because they compete with everything else. What works is making the update small enough that it happens as part of shipping.

A demo re-recorded in ten minutes gets re-recorded. A deck with fourteen screenshots does not, and that difference decides whether your marketing is accurate a year from now.

Cut the surface area

The real fix for most teams is fewer assets. Three current demos are worth more than twelve stale ones, and the twelve are actively costing you credibility.

Delete what nobody uses. A smaller library is not a compromise here, it is the thing that makes accuracy achievable.

Tie it to the release, not the calendar

Add one line to whatever you do when shipping a visible change: which demos and screenshots does this affect?

That question takes seconds, catches drift at the moment somebody knows the answer, and works where a quarterly review does not.

Frequently asked questions

Why does marketing content get out of date?
Because assets are made once at launch when there is time, nobody owns them afterwards, retaking screenshots is tedious, and nobody visits their own marketing -- so the person who would notice the drift never looks at it.
How do I keep demos and screenshots current?
Make the update small enough to happen as part of shipping, and tie it to the release rather than a calendar. Add one question to your release routine: which demos and screenshots does this change affect?
Is it better to have fewer marketing assets?
Usually yes. Three current demos are worth more than twelve stale ones, and the twelve actively cost credibility. A smaller library is what makes accuracy achievable rather than a compromise on ambition.

Keep reading

This is what Demorta does

Click through it — the same kind of demo you can record of your own product.

Try it on your own product

Record your first interactive demo free.

Five demos on the free plan, forever. No credit card, no trial countdown, no sales call. Install the Chrome extension, click through your product once, and you have a shareable link in about ten minutes.

Start free →