How can a dev agency show work that is under NDA?

Capture the flow and redact it -- replacing real names and figures with invented ones, where the redaction destroys the underlying data rather than covering it. That leaves a showable artefact where the live system cannot be shared at all.

How do interactive demos help sprint reviews?

A recorded walkthrough of what shipped, sent before the call, turns the review into feedback rather than narration and reaches stakeholders who never join the call. It matters most on long builds where much of the work is invisible.

When is a demo the wrong tool for an agency project?

When the deliverable is a backend, an integration or infrastructure with nothing visual to capture. A demo of the admin panel sitting over it is the honest substitute; a demo of a terminal is not.

← Back to blog

Interactive Demos for Software Development Agencies

August 21, 2026

Dev shops have the hardest portfolio problem in the agency world: most of the work is behind a login, under NDA, or is an internal tool nobody outside the client will ever see.

A captured, redacted demo is often the only showable artefact a project produces.

For new business

A prospect cannot evaluate a codebase and will not read a case study carefully. Two minutes clicking through something you built, with captions explaining the decisions, does what a portfolio entry cannot.

Redaction is what makes this possible on client work: replace real names and figures with invented ones, and the flow is showable while the data is gone from the file rather than covered up.

For sprint reviews

A recorded walkthrough of what shipped this sprint, sent before the call, means the review is about feedback instead of narration. It also reaches the stakeholders who never join the call and later ask what happened.

This is a small habit with an outsized effect on how a client perceives progress, particularly on long builds where a lot of the work is invisible.

For handover

The admin flows the client will run themselves.
The deploy or release process, if they are taking it on.
The awkward parts -- the manual step, the workaround, the thing that needs care. Documenting these honestly prevents the support call.
One demo per flow, not one long tour, so a specific answer can be sent later without the rest.

Where it fails

If the client is buying a backend, an integration or infrastructure, there may be nothing visual to capture. Demos are the wrong tool there, and saying so is better than producing a demo of a terminal.

A demo of the admin panel over that backend is often the honest substitute — it shows the result rather than the mechanism.

Frequently asked questions

How can a dev agency show work that is under NDA?: Capture the flow and redact it -- replacing real names and figures with invented ones, where the redaction destroys the underlying data rather than covering it. That leaves a showable artefact where the live system cannot be shared at all.
How do interactive demos help sprint reviews?: A recorded walkthrough of what shipped, sent before the call, turns the review into feedback rather than narration and reaches stakeholders who never join the call. It matters most on long builds where much of the work is invisible.
When is a demo the wrong tool for an agency project?: When the deliverable is a backend, an integration or infrastructure with nothing visual to capture. A demo of the admin panel sitting over it is the honest substitute; a demo of a terminal is not.

Keep reading

This is what Demorta does

Click through it — the same kind of demo you can record of your own product.

Try it on your own product

Record your first interactive demo free.

Five demos on the free plan, forever. No credit card, no trial countdown, no sales call. Install the Chrome extension, click through your product once, and you have a shareable link in about ten minutes.

Start free →