Build it by using your product, not by rebuilding it in an editor.
5 demos free, forever, with no card required. Branching, narration and lead capture are on paid plans from $15.99/month.
A demo builder is only worth having if a non-technical person can produce something publishable on a Tuesday afternoon without help.
That is the bar here: the build step is clicking through your own product, and everything after it is editing what was captured.
The extension records each click as a step, in order, with the screen and the click point.
Reorder, cut steps, rewrite captions, zoom into the part that matters on each screen.
Branching so viewers choose their own path, and a lead form if you want contact details before or after.
A link, an embed, or an MP4, GIF and PDF export from the same recording.
Recorded in a few minutes with the tool this page is about — click through it.
Nothing is installed into your application, no script is added to your site to make a demo, and no engineer has to be involved to publish one. The embed is a single iframe when you want it on a page.
That matters mostly because the person who needs the demo is rarely the person who can deploy code, and waiting for a sprint is how demos stop getting made.
A tool that turns your product into a clickable walkthrough someone can move through themselves, without an account or an install. The good ones build from a real recording rather than asking you to rebuild your interface inside their editor.
No. Recording happens through a browser extension, editing is in a dashboard, and publishing gives you a link or a single iframe. Nothing is deployed into your product and no engineer needs to be involved.
Yes — branching lets a viewer choose the use case that fits them, so one demo serves several audiences instead of averaging them into a tour that suits nobody. It is on the paid plans.