← Back to blog

Supademo vs Storylane vs Arcade: An Honest Comparison

August 14, 2026

If you have searched for interactive demo software, you have seen these three names. Most comparisons of them are written by one of them, which tends to show.

This one is written by a competitor, so treat it accordingly — but it is written to be checkable. Every claim here is about positioning you can verify on each vendor's own site in about five minutes, and you should.

How they capture, and why it matters

The single biggest technical difference between demo tools is what they capture: pixels or the page itself.

Screenshot capture takes an image per step. It works on literally anything — a desktop app, a PDF, a canvas-heavy editor — and the result is stable, because an image cannot break. It gets soft if you zoom in far, since there is a fixed number of pixels.

HTML capture stores the actual page structure. Text stays sharp at any zoom and the result can be edited afterwards — you can change a customer name in a demo without touching an image editor. It is also more fragile: heavy JavaScript apps, canvas rendering and unusual CSS can all reproduce imperfectly.

Storylane leans hardest into HTML capture. Arcade is strongly screenshot-and-video oriented with a polished feel. Supademo sits between the two. Demorta offers both, defaulting to screenshots because they are the mode that never surprises you.

Who each one is built for

  • Arcade — marketing teams who care how it looks. The output is glossy and it shows well on a homepage.
  • Storylane — sales and presales teams at funded companies, especially where personalising a demo per account matters. The deepest feature set of the three, priced accordingly.
  • Supademo — the broadest fit and the friendliest entry point. Good free tier, quick to learn, popular with smaller teams.
  • Navattic — worth naming here too: Navattic is the most enterprise and sales-led of the group.

The pricing shape, not the numbers

Published prices change often enough that quoting them in an article is a disservice. The shape is stabler and more useful.

All three are per-seat, and all three put the features that make demos a revenue channel — lead capture, viewer analytics, personalisation, CRM integrations — above the entry tier. This means the real cost is rarely the sticker price of one seat; it is the tier you land on once you want to know who watched, times the number of people who need to edit.

That structure suits teams with a budget line for it and is genuinely painful for a two-person startup, which is the gap Demorta was built for: unlimited demos from $15.99/mo, viewer analytics from $39.99/mo, and a free plan that is five demos rather than a countdown.

How to choose without a two-week evaluation

Build one flow in two tools. The same flow, eight to twelve steps, the moment where a prospect first sees your product do something worth paying for.

Then check three things: how long it took, whether the capture reproduced your app faithfully (this is where HTML-capture tools sometimes fail on a complex UI), and whether a colleague who has never seen it clicks all the way to the end.

Feature matrices do not answer any of those, and every one of these tools has a free tier that lets you find out for real.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Supademo, Storylane and Arcade?
Mostly capture method and audience. Storylane leans on HTML capture and targets funded sales and presales teams with per-account personalisation. Arcade is screenshot and video oriented with a polished, marketing-friendly output. Supademo sits between them with the friendliest entry point and a good free tier.
Which interactive demo tool is cheapest?
All the well-known tools are per-seat and place lead capture, analytics and integrations above the entry tier, so the real cost is that tier times your number of editors. Demorta is deliberately cheaper at each step, with unlimited demos from $15.99/mo and a free plan of five demos with no card.
Is screenshot capture or HTML capture better for demos?
Screenshots work on anything and never break, but soften when zoomed. HTML capture keeps text sharp at any zoom and stays editable afterwards, but can reproduce imperfectly on JavaScript-heavy or canvas-based apps. If your product is a standard web app, HTML is attractive; if it is complex or non-web, screenshots are safer.
How do I evaluate interactive demo tools quickly?
Build the same eight-to-twelve-step flow in two tools, then check how long it took, whether the capture reproduced your UI faithfully, and whether a colleague who has never seen it reaches the end without stopping. Every major tool has a free tier, so this costs an afternoon and nothing else.

Keep reading

This is what Demorta does

Click through it — the same kind of demo you can record of your own product.

Try it on your own product

Record your first interactive demo free.

Five demos on the free plan, forever. No credit card, no trial countdown, no sales call. Install the Chrome extension, click through your product once, and you have a shareable link in about ten minutes.

Start free →