Interactive demos have a bad reputation with developers, and it is deserved: most are marketing walkthroughs that explain a dashboard nobody was going to struggle with.
Used differently they work well in DevRel, and the difference is what you choose to show.
What developers actually get stuck on
Not the concepts. The setup. Getting credentials, finding the right console page, understanding what the dashboard is telling them when a request fails.
That is exactly the part your documentation describes least well, because whoever wrote it had all of it configured already.
What to demo, and what not to
- Do demo the console. Where the API key lives, where logs appear, what a failed request looks like in the UI.
- Do demo the first successful call end to end, including the part where it does not work yet.
- Do not demo the code. Put it in a code block they can copy. A screenshot of code is actively hostile.
- Do not narrate what a JSON response is. Assume competence about the language, not about your product.
Where it belongs in docs
Inside the quickstart, next to the step people fail at -- usually authentication. Not a separate "watch a demo" page, which developers skip.
A short demo embedded in a doc page is read as a diagram. A full-page demo experience is read as marketing, and closed.
Where it genuinely helps DevRel
- Conference talks. A recorded walkthrough as a fallback when the venue wifi fails, which it will.
- Issue responses. "Here is what that looks like in the console" answers faster than three paragraphs.
- Onboarding new advocates. Your own team learns the product this way too.
- Changelogs. A ten-second clip of a new console feature beats a paragraph nobody reads.
The credibility test
Show an error. A developer-facing demo where every request succeeds first time is describing a product they have not met. Showing a 401, and the console page that explains why, does more for trust than any amount of polish.
Frequently asked questions
- Do developers respond well to interactive demos?
- To a guided tour of a dashboard, no. To a short walkthrough of the setup steps they actually get stuck on -- finding credentials, reading logs, understanding a failed request in the console -- yes, because that is the part documentation covers worst.
- Should a developer demo include code?
- Not as screenshots. Code belongs in a copyable block; a screenshot of code is unusable and reads as careless. Demo the parts that are visual -- the console, the dashboard, the error state -- and let the code stay text.
- Where should a demo go in developer documentation?
- Inside the quickstart, next to the step with the highest drop-off, which is usually authentication. A short embedded demo is read as a diagram; a separate "watch a demo" page is read as marketing and skipped.
This is what Demorta does
Click through it — the same kind of demo you can record of your own product.
Try it on your own product
Record your first interactive demo free.
Five demos on the free plan, forever. No credit card, no trial countdown, no sales call. Install the Chrome extension, click through your product once, and you have a shareable link in about ten minutes.
Start free →