← Back to blog

Where the Cursor Goes

August 25, 2026

On a screenshot demo the cursor is doing almost all the directing. It is the difference between a viewer who knows where to look and one scanning a whole interface hoping something stands out.

It is also the element most often left wherever the recording happened to put it.

What it is for

Answering "where did that happen" before the viewer has to work it out. A caption says what changed; the cursor says where — and the pairing is what makes a step readable in four seconds.

Without it a viewer reads the caption, then hunts the screen, then reconnects. That is three actions where there should be one, and it is why some demos feel like work.

Continuity beats accuracy

  • Land where the last one ended. A pointer that teleports between steps reads as unrelated screens rather than one session.
  • Move visibly. A cursor that travels shows a connection; one that cuts does not.
  • Stay put when nothing was clicked. A scroll step with a jumping cursor is confusing rather than helpful.
  • Be exactly on the control, not near it. Off by twenty pixels reads as a mistake, and viewers notice.

When to leave it out

A step where nothing was clicked — a result, a finished report, an empty state — is better without one. Adding a cursor there invents an interaction that did not happen and points at nothing in particular.

The same goes for a step whose whole screen is the point. A pointer competes with what you are trying to show.

A cursor is not a substitute for framing

On a dense screen a pointer alone is not enough — the viewer still has to find a small arrow in a busy layout. That is what zoom is for, and the two work together: zoom decides what is on screen, the cursor decides where in it.

Reaching for one to fix a problem that belongs to the other is the commonest mistake here.

Frequently asked questions

Should every demo step show a cursor?
No. A step where nothing was clicked -- a result, a finished report, an empty state -- is better without one, because adding a cursor invents an interaction that did not happen and points at nothing.
Why does cursor continuity matter?
A pointer that teleports between steps reads as unrelated screens rather than one session. Landing where the last one ended, and travelling visibly, is what makes a sequence feel like somebody using the product.
Is a cursor enough on a busy screen?
No -- the viewer still has to find a small arrow in a dense layout. Zoom decides what is on screen and the cursor decides where in it; reaching for one to fix a problem belonging to the other is the common mistake.

Keep reading

This is what Demorta does

Click through it — the same kind of demo you can record of your own product.

Try it on your own product

Record your first interactive demo free.

Five demos on the free plan, forever. No credit card, no trial countdown, no sales call. Install the Chrome extension, click through your product once, and you have a shareable link in about ten minutes.

Start free →